Welcome
Welcome to antiX-forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free, so please, join our community today!

Conky at startup

Post bugs, comments here.

Postby eriefisher on Thu Apr 03, 2008 6:50 pm

Wow, that's really cool!! I didn't know it was that flexible. OOi, do you just grab icons from various sources & use them (jpg's, png's, xpm's etc) or are there icons supplied?


I think the only format not supported is svg.

I have to go so I will send the files when I get back.

eriefisher
User avatar
eriefisher
 
Posts: 1032
Joined: Sun Oct 07, 2007 6:16 pm
Location: Canada's South Coast

Postby Subito Piano on Sat Apr 05, 2008 5:30 am

Oh - but i LIKE the roxified desktop!!! Mostly, i am constantly thinking of those i introduce Linux to. They kinda get lost without those familiar desktop icons...although certainly icewm looks kinda familiar even without them.

I like the earlier suggestion of having options at bootup to pick whether or not to use the panel. I once tried another distro (Vector Live, i forget which version) that had several wm options at the login screen, including:

icewm
roxified icewm
fluxbox
roxified fluxbox

I only say this because it was great to be able to choose from several preconfigured window managers and have every one of them working correctly "out of the box." Since i was less familiar with the various desktop environments then, i booted into one and tried it, logged out, tried the next, etc. It was great and i quickly found one i liked!

So there, i've said it (again!) -- my two bits. My next stop is to download and test the antiX-KDElite version. (Probably i will find it even more newbie-friendly since it's KDE.)

Now that i am voting for more work and headaches for anticapitalista, maybe antiX could come with all that complicated tweaking already done so users can have both the icons AND conky going at the same time. (I could donate some bottles of Exedrin... ;-) )

Kidding aside, you are doing really cool stuff! It is wonderful to have so many choices in the Mepis family. Thank you!
User avatar
Subito Piano
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2007 4:58 am
Location: upstate NY

Postby impuwat on Mon Apr 21, 2008 11:56 pm

Sorry...this is a little late but life (or death in this case) has had me sidetracked for a month or so.

I will always vote for the fluxbox desktop as the default. I see the value of rox set up with some default icons but would rather have it as the secondary choice.

Keep up the good work!
User avatar
impuwat
 
Posts: 227
Joined: Thu Sep 13, 2007 3:20 am
Location: Idaho

Postby OU812 on Tue Apr 22, 2008 6:54 am

Subito Piano's suggestion reminds me of older vector linux releases.

If your wallpaper has "gray bars" on the sides, then this is probably related to the way rox is displaying the wall. You need to enable the stretch option (I think that's what it's called - or maybe scaled). Right-click on an icon and you should be able to figure it out from there (I'm using a kde desktop right now so I can't give you specifics).

So maybe using rox to manage the desktop is not to everyone's liking; in fact, I don't like it much either (or the way pcmanfm mangages desktop is perhaps more awkward). Perhaps it would be better to use idesk for icons or go all out and use wbar as vector linux has done. The gains from using rox are outweighed by the losses?

Overall, I like the direction in which antix is heading. The repos are still a bit of a sticking point though - there's pros and cons to using the mepis 7.0 repos and the antix ones. Keep up the good work and the dialogs.

john
OU812
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: California

Postby DJiNN on Tue Apr 22, 2008 11:54 am

I've tried a few times to get into using Rox as the manager, but it just doesn't work for me. That's why i think idesk (or something similar) is better.

Isn't there something called fbdesk for fluxbox which will give you an iconified desktop?
User avatar
DJiNN
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:56 am
Location: UK

Postby harii on Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:18 am

Don't fbdesk only work with fluxbox ?
If we use idesk it would work with icewm & fluxbox.
Idesk, Yab, wbar or tablaunch bar on top with only the basics?

Mail
Files/Home
Chat
Web
User avatar
harii
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:35 am
Location: waterloo,ia

Postby OU812 on Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:24 am

I tried wbar once. It took a little work to get it going. One problem I didn't solve was changing wallpaper messed up the wbar background a little bit. I took a look a vector linux's config, but never had a chance to implement it. When antix goes final, I'll give it a try on my desktop.

john
OU812
 
Posts: 697
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 9:12 pm
Location: California

Postby harii on Thu Apr 24, 2008 5:46 am

i think SAM linux uses wbar as well.
i downloaded it up to look where the config files went but never got anywhere.
easier fish to fry--other things to try
User avatar
harii
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:35 am
Location: waterloo,ia

Postby DJiNN on Thu Apr 24, 2008 1:11 pm

wbar is really cool (at the moment) & possibly moreso than idesk, and that's why it's so popular. It does look slick/cool, and also does it's job very well, when it's set up correctly, which is easier said than done (at least in my limited experience) :)

Does anyone here know if awn (Avant Window Manager) will work within fluxbox (GTK etc) or is it "Gnome Only"? Shame if it is, because it looks great! Don't you just love eyecandy!? :)
User avatar
DJiNN
 
Posts: 274
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2007 4:56 am
Location: UK

Previous

Return to antiX-M7.2 beta and preview

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests